In the summer of 2024, Bangladesh was rocked by a series of anti-government protests that would come to be known as the July Revolution. What began as student-led demonstrations calling for reforms to the government’s controversial job-quota system grew rapidly into a nationwide uprising in response to the ruling party’s efforts to suppress the first wave of protests through authoritarian crackdowns and escalating violence.
A UN report estimates that as many as 1,400 people were killed during these protests, by police, paramilitary forces, and members of the student wing of the Awami League, Bangladesh’s ruling party.
On 16 July 2024, during one of the deadliest weeks of the uprising, a student at Begum Rokeya University in Rangpur, Abu Sayed, was fatally shot by police during a protest outside the university campus. His death, and the circumstances surrounding it, soon became a symbol of resistance against the Bangladeshi state’s disproportionate use of force in response to the protests. The slogan ‘Buk petechi guli kor’ (‘Shoot me, I bare my chest’), which had emerged within a nationwide movement against sexual violence in 2020, came to also stand for Sayed’s death and all it represented, signalling his defiant posture—arms spread, chest bared—in the moments before he was shot.
By the time the protests began, the Awami League had been in power since 2009 under the rule of Sheikh Hasina, whose control over political institutions, including the judiciary and security sectors, had expanded steadily during her time in office. Sheikh Hasina’s tenure was characterised by a growing climate of fear and repression, as surveillance, harassment, and extrajudicial violence became normalised.
Her government’s reinstatement of a controversial quota system for public sector jobs—which proposed to allocate one-third of government jobs to descendants of the veterans of Bangladesh’s ‘Liberation War’ of 1971—came against a backdrop of heightened income inequality and growing discontent with the corruption, cronyism, and resulting lack of opportunity for young people seeking employment. The quota system was widely criticised for perpetuating systemic inequalities, however, as the demonstrations expanded, so too did the focus of protesters’ frustrations, to also include the militarisation of public life, economic precarity exacerbated by government policies, and the suppression of free speech and dissent.
In response to the growth of the student-led protest movement, the Chhatra League—the student wing of the Awami League, which already played a significant role in campus politics across the country—were accused of attacking peaceful demonstrators, sometimes in apparent coordination with law enforcement. As the demonstrations grew further, the government mobilised armed police units and paramilitary forces, whose use of lethal munitions resulted in hundreds of deaths in the week of 15 July alone, followed by mass arrests.
Despite the government’s efforts to intimidate and delegitimise the protest movement, on 5 August—or ‘36 July’, as revolutionaries later called it—Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina was forced to resign, and flee the country. The protests had united many disparate subsets of the population in their demand for justice and opposition to the socioeconomic and political systems that had marginalised many for decades and threatened the futures of many more.
Our investigation found that during the protest on 16 July 2024, police fired at Abu Sayed from a distance of 14.2m, using lead birdshot designed for hunting. Sayed was shot in the chest and face, and subsequently succumbed to his injuries.
Moments before his death, Abu Sayed was photographed standing before the police, arms stretched wide in defiance. This image of Sayed has become a potent symbol of the state’s violent suppression of dissent, during one of the most politically charged periods in Bangladesh’s recent history.
Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina made three claims regarding the death of Abu Sayed:
These assertions originate from two primary sources: a video posted by the Awami League’s official Facebook page, and a leaked phone call, posted to YouTube and widely circulated, both containing audio attributed to Sheikh Hasina.
During this time, many protesters were preemptively deleting any photos or videos they had taken at the ‘July protests’, out of fear of reprisals. However, with the support of the Drik Picture Library, we were able to gather sufficient visual material to interrogate the claims made by Sheikh Hasina, and the circumstances of Sayed’s death.
FA’s investigation into the killing of Abu Sayed, conducted in collaboration with Drik Picture Library (DPL) in Dhaka, used advanced spatial and visual analysis methods to verify, reconstruct, and challenge official narratives regarding the incident.
The following methodological steps were undertaken:
We gathered video and photographic evidence from social media platforms, livestreams, journalists, and witnesses. Each file was assessed for metadata, geolocated, and time-stamped to ensure authenticity and chronological accuracy. Each file’s metadata included a different timecode, which made it necessary to rely on visual and audio cues to accurately reconstruct the timeline. This process also explains why the timecode on the CCTV footage has been blurred out, as it did not correspond to real-time and could have caused confusion.
The collected footage, capturing different vantage points were synchronized using visual and audio cues, including gunshots, megaphone announcements, and crowd movement. This allowed for a frame-accurate reconstruction of events from the first police firing to Abu Sayed’s collapse.
We conducted detailed documentation of the site outside Begum Rokeya University, Rangpur. Our collaborators at DPL conducted an extensive, professional drone survey of the site and sourced ground photography of the entire length of the road, which allowed us to create a highly accurate 3D photogrammetry model of the scene.
A three-dimensional digital model of the site was built using photogrammetry techniques. This model was used to place cameras, trace trajectories, and measure distances between protestors and police, including the exact position of Abu Sayed and the police men that shot him at the time of the shooting.
By analysing the wound patterns, spatial positioning, the spread of pellets visible on Abu Sayed’s clothing, as well as analyzing images of the shooting, we determined that he was shot with a 12-bore shotgun loaded with birdshot pellets at a close range of approximately 14.22 meters, contradicting claims of rubber bullet use, and claims that he was killed by protestors.
We constructed a map of the crowd the moment Abu Sayed was shot to demonstrate that he was isolated from the main body of protesters when he was shot, and that the use of live ammunition was not preceded by the legally required warning or imminent threat.
Through analysis of still images, spent cartridges, and shell casings recovered from the scene, we identified the weapon used as a 12-gauge shotgun. The ammunition used matched birdshot lead pellets—an inappropriate munition for crowd control.
Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s claims that Abu Sayed was killed by a rock, delayed medical response, or rubber bullets were systematically examined against the visual and forensic record. Each was found to be unsupported by evidence.
This multi-method approach allowed us to conclusively establish that Abu Sayed was deliberately targeted and fatally shot by police while unarmed—amounting to an extrajudicial killing under international legal definitions.