Search 
Go Back to Investigations

Date of Incident

7 Oct 2023 - Ongoing

Publication Date

14 Mar 2024

Commissioned By

Self-Initiated

Additional Funding

  • Porticus
 
Media & Resources

Read the full report: Inhumane Zones: An assessment of Israel’s actions with respect to the provision of aid, shelter, safe passage, and assistance to evacuees in Gaza; response to questions raised in the ICJ on 17 May 2024

Read the full report: Humanitarian Violence: Israel’s Abuse of Preventative Measures in its 2023-2024 Genocidal Military Campaign in the Occupied Gaza Strip

Editor’s note: throughout our analysis of Israeli evacuation orders, we frequently refer to ‘north’ and ‘south’ in quotes, to indicate that these are designations imposed by Israel that fluctuate according to the Israeli military agenda and do not correspond to the geography of the Gaza Strip recognised by its Palestinian residents. Similarly, we refer to ‘safe routes’ and ‘safe zones’ in quotes to reflect that they are neither safe nor implemented in accordance with their clear definitions under international law. ‘Evacuation orders’ likewise have not been executed in compliance with international law, and therefore what is referred to here as ‘evacuation orders’ does not in fact meet the legal criteria for the correct application of this humanitarian measure.

Since 7 October 2023, Forensic Architecture has documented the mass displacement of Palestinian civilians being carried out by the Israeli military in the Gaza Strip, and identified three overlapping phases in its execution. Across all three phases, the Israeli military has repeatedly abused the humanitarian measures of evacuation orders, ‘safe routes’, and ‘safe zones’, and failed to comply with the laws governing their application within a wartime context. These patterns of systematic violence and destruction have forced Palestinian civilians from one unsafe area to the next, confirming the conclusion echoed across civilian testimonies, media reports, and assessments by the UN and other humanitarian aid organisations, that ‘there is no safe place in Gaza’.

Phases of Mass Displacement

Phase 1: Mass displacement from ‘north’ to ‘south’
13 October – 24 November 2023

We locate this first phase of displacement as beginning on 13 October 2023, when the Israeli military issued an order for ‘the entire population of the Gaza Strip north of Wadi Gaza’ (around 1.1 million Palestinians) to evacuate and relocate to the ‘south’ within 24 hours.

October Evacuation Order - Figure 1. The region indicated for evacuation by the 13 October evacuation order is highlighted in yellow. The area of this region is 134km², or 37% of the total area of the Gaza Strip. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
Figure 1. The region indicated for evacuation by the 13 October evacuation order is highlighted in yellow. The area of this region is 134km², or 37% of the total area of the Gaza Strip. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)

Our analysis of satellite imagery reveals that across several weeks in early November the Israeli army carved an east-to-west military route through the lived fabric of the Gaza Strip. The new route was 3km north of Wadi Gaza and functioned as a makeshift, militarised border demarcating a new north/south divide (Figure 2). A military checkpoint was set up at the intersection of this border line and Salah al-Din Street, Gaza’s main traffic artery and the sole evacuation route at this time. Palestinians attempting to move south along this route found themselves surrounded by snipers upon arrival at this checkpoint, and reportedly were ordered by megaphone, under threat of warning shots and arrests, to disrobe for searches and to face cameras, presumably for the gathering of biometric data. As of 14 March 2024, displaced Palestinians have not been permitted by the Israeli military to return ‘north’ since October, not even during the November ceasefire. Civilians who have attempted to cross back through the checkpoint have reportedly been shot at, some fatally.

 - Figure 2. Satellite imagery (© Planet Labs PBC) from 17 November shows the extent of the unofficial demarcation line extending from the western to eastern boundaries of Gaza. Left: Wadi Gaza is marked by a blue line. Right: Satellite imagery (© Maxar Technologies) from 14 November shows that a new checkpoint was installed where this new demarcation line intersects with Salah al-Din Street, one of the two main thoroughfares connecting Gaza's northern and southern regions and the sole evacuation route at this time (indicated by a solid orange line). (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
Figure 2. Satellite imagery (© Planet Labs PBC) from 17 November shows the extent of the unofficial demarcation line extending from the western to eastern boundaries of Gaza. Left: Wadi Gaza is marked by a blue line. Right: Satellite imagery (© Maxar Technologies) from 14 November shows that a new checkpoint was installed where this new demarcation line intersects with Salah al-Din Street, one of the two main thoroughfares connecting Gaza's northern and southern regions and the sole evacuation route at this time (indicated by a solid orange line). (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
 - Figure 3. Left: Aerial view (satellite imagery © Maxar Technologies) of the checkpoint on Salah al-Din Street. Right: The checkpoint as viewed from an Israeli military position (marked with a camera icon on the left image). Video source: https://twitter.com/darthintra/status/1724198163006038226 (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
Figure 3. Left: Aerial view (satellite imagery © Maxar Technologies) of the checkpoint on Salah al-Din Street. Right: The checkpoint as viewed from an Israeli military position (marked with a camera icon on the left image). Video source: https://twitter.com/darthintra/status/1724198163006038226 (Forensic Architecture, 2024)

Phase 2: The Evacuation Grid
1 December 2023 – ongoing

On 1 December 2023, the Israeli military introduced an interactive grid-based evacuation map that divided Gaza into 623 blocks. Using this evacuation grid, the military began ordering Palestinians in areas throughout Gaza, including south of Wadi Gaza—such as Khan Younis and the refugee camps in central Gaza—to evacuate.

 - Figure 4. A graphic of all areas in the Gaza Strip ordered to evacuate during Phase 1: those given ‘evacuation orders' before the numbered grid system was introduced on 1 December 2023 (in light yellow), and those ordered to evacuate using the numbered block system in Phase 2 between 2 December 2023 and 6 March 2024 (in dark yellow). The ‘evacuation orders’ extended to the refugee camps in the middle of the Gaza Strip, such as Wusta Refugee Camp, and large areas in the Khan Younis municipality. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
Figure 4. A graphic of all areas in the Gaza Strip ordered to evacuate during Phase 1: those given ‘evacuation orders' before the numbered grid system was introduced on 1 December 2023 (in light yellow), and those ordered to evacuate using the numbered block system in Phase 2 between 2 December 2023 and 6 March 2024 (in dark yellow). The ‘evacuation orders’ extended to the refugee camps in the middle of the Gaza Strip, such as Wusta Refugee Camp, and large areas in the Khan Younis municipality. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
 - Figure 5. Our recreation of the 'evacuation grid’ of 623 numbered blocks released by the Israeli military on 1 December. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
Figure 5. Our recreation of the 'evacuation grid’ of 623 numbered blocks released by the Israeli military on 1 December. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)

The ‘evacuation orders’ issued referencing this grid have been imprecise, inconsistent, and sometimes even contradictory, leading to panic and confusion among the civilian population about which areas should be evacuated. For example, across nine different ‘evacuation orders’, the shaded areas designating ‘evacuation zones’ (areas highlighted in a map and instructed to evacuate) did not correspond with the blocks in the evacuation grid (Figure 6). Instead, the ‘evacuation zones’ followed a different logic to that of the grid, resulting in some blocks on the grid being only partially included in the designated zones. This has produced further uncertainty among Palestinian residents in or near those areas about how to correctly interpret these maps and the boundaries of the ‘zones’ depicted within them.

 - Figure 6. An evacuation order published on 2 December highlighted an elliptical area for evacuation (dashed line). While some of the numbered blocks were squarely within this elliptical area, others were only partially included (ambiguously divided by the dashed line), raising confusing about whether they should be evacuated or not. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
Figure 6. An evacuation order published on 2 December highlighted an elliptical area for evacuation (dashed line). While some of the numbered blocks were squarely within this elliptical area, others were only partially included (ambiguously divided by the dashed line), raising confusing about whether they should be evacuated or not. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
 - Figure 7. The accumulation of areas ordered to evacuate throughout the three phases, along with the arrows that were annotated in these evacuation orders. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
Figure 7. The accumulation of areas ordered to evacuate throughout the three phases, along with the arrows that were annotated in these evacuation orders. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)

While on a case-by-case basis the evacuation orders may appear poorly designed and even careless, when viewed collectively, they evidence systematic forced displacement at a mass scale, whereby Palestinians have been progressively pushed into areas further and further south that are subsequently subject to attack or evacuation or both. As the areas ordered to evacuate have expanded, the Israeli ground invasion has advanced. Rather than deploying these ‘humanitarian measures’ as a means of protecting civilian life, Israel has instead amplified the risk to civilian life, unequivocally failing to comply with the laws that govern their implementation and to provide adequate justification for their military necessity.

Phase 3: Mass displacement from ‘safe zones’
22 January 2024 – ongoing

Satellite imagery reveals that throughout January, thousands of Palestinians sought refuge in al-Aqsa University, located within the designated ‘Mawasi Humanitarian Zone’. On 22 January, the Israeli army invaded this ‘humanitarian zone’; by 29 January, updated satellite imagery showed that the Israeli army had demolished the dense camp of tents on the Aqsa University campus. Satellite images from the same day show displaced Palestinians stopped at a makeshift checkpoint in al-Mawasi, revealing ‘safe zones’ as a tool for tightening Israeli control over the displaced. Attacks on the ‘safe zones’, including Rafah, have escalated in the last few weeks.

 - Figure 8. A map showing the total area subjected to evacuation orders (in yellow) and ‘safe zones’ (in blue). The distinction between ‘Declared Safe Zones’ and ‘Declared Safe Regions’ is that the latter do not have explicitly defined boundaries; rather, they mark entire municipalities declared safe by Israeli announcements (here, Rafah and Deir al-Balah). (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
Figure 8. A map showing the total area subjected to evacuation orders (in yellow) and ‘safe zones’ (in blue). The distinction between ‘Declared Safe Zones’ and ‘Declared Safe Regions’ is that the latter do not have explicitly defined boundaries; rather, they mark entire municipalities declared safe by Israeli announcements (here, Rafah and Deir al-Balah). (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
 - Figure 9. ISW data shows that Israeli military clearing operations are reported within the ‘Mawasi Humanitarian Zone’ by 22 January 2024. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
Figure 9. ISW data shows that Israeli military clearing operations are reported within the ‘Mawasi Humanitarian Zone’ by 22 January 2024. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)

Abuse and Weaponisation of ‘Evacuation Orders’ at Large to Facilitate Mass Displacement, Fatalities, and Genocidal Acts

‘Evacuation orders’ to areas that were already subject to ‘evacuation orders’

In some instances, Palestinians in Gaza were directed to evacuate to areas that had themselves received ‘evacuation orders’ less than 24 hours prior. For instance, on 2 December 2023, multiple regions were ordered to evacuate and relocate, including al-Fukhari. Subsequently, on 3 December, zones in central Khan Younis were instructed by the Israeli military to evacuate and relocate to al-Shaboura, Tel al-Sultan, and al-Fukhari—the latter of which had already been ordered to evacuate (see Figure 10).

 - Figure 10. A map showing an evacuation order posted on 3 December 2023 (in dark yellow, red arrows), compared to an evacuation order posted the previous day on 2 December 2023 (in light yellow). One of the arrows explicitly instructs moving to al-Fukhari (labelled red), which had already been instructed to evacuate on 2 December 2023. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
Figure 10. A map showing an evacuation order posted on 3 December 2023 (in dark yellow, red arrows), compared to an evacuation order posted the previous day on 2 December 2023 (in light yellow). One of the arrows explicitly instructs moving to al-Fukhari (labelled red), which had already been instructed to evacuate on 2 December 2023. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)

Ground invasion of areas that had not yet received ‘evacuation orders’

Our analysis reveals that a ground invasion of al-Mawasi and the central part of Khan Younis city had already commenced on 22 January 2024, even though neither of these areas had received any ‘evacuation orders’ at that time. While an ‘evacuation order’ was issued subsequently for the centre of Khan Younis on 23 January 2024, after the ground invasion of the area had already begun, at the time of writing al-Mawasi has yet to receive a formal ‘evacuation order’ and is still designated as a ‘safe zone’—despite being subject to attack. The order for Khan Younis came only after the military siege on Nasser and al-Amal Hospitals (see Figure 11) and the reported attack on Khalidiya school—also located in Khan Younis—that was acting as a shelter for displaced civilians.

 - Figure 11. A map created by Forensic Architecture of evacuation orders issued by the Israeli military up until 22 January (yellow), the al-Mawasi 'safe zone' announced by the Israeli military on 13 December (blue), and ISW data showing the Israeli ground invasion until 22 January (red). The ground invasion encroached both beyond the announced evacuation area and into the al-Mawasi humanitarian zone. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
Figure 11. A map created by Forensic Architecture of evacuation orders issued by the Israeli military up until 22 January (yellow), the al-Mawasi 'safe zone' announced by the Israeli military on 13 December (blue), and ISW data showing the Israeli ground invasion until 22 January (red). The ground invasion encroached both beyond the announced evacuation area and into the al-Mawasi humanitarian zone. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)

Unspecified durations for ‘evacuation orders’

Our study revealed numerous cases where the timeline of the ‘evacuation orders’ was unclear, with certain areas receiving the same directive multiple times. It was not clear to individuals residing or sheltering in these areas when the ‘evacuation order’ should be thought to expire, or if it was safe for residents to return to the areas in question. The area of al-Nusairat camp, for instance, received multiple ‘evacuation orders’ during the period of 22 December 2023 to 8 January 2024, triggering significant displacement towards the designated ‘safe zones’ in Deir al-Balah and Rafah. A combination of subsequent attacks on these ‘safe zones’ and the absence of additional ‘evacuation orders’ for al-Nusairat led displaced families to believe they could safely return to their homes in February 2024. However, in early February the Israeli military conducted a series of airstrikes in these areas again, resulting in civilian casualties among those who had returned. Using witness testimony and footage, Forensic Architecture verified the killing of two Palestinian women on 10 February 2024, just a few days after they had returned to al-Nusairat from Rafah.

Patterns of consecutive displacement

In our analysis, we observed that ‘evacuation orders’ have facilitated multiple sequential and consecutive displacements. During the different phases of ‘evacuation orders’, Palestinians in Gaza were instructed to evacuate to areas that received their own ‘evacuation order’. For instance, as part of the first phase of ‘evacuation orders’, the Israeli army ordered that the entire population north of Wadi Gaza relocate ‘south’, to areas including Khan Younis and Nusairat. Subsequently in December 2023, the Israeli army began using the ‘evacuation grid’ to instruct Palestinians in those same ‘southern’ areas to relocate even further south to ‘safe zones’ including Rafah—which has itself since come under attack and remains under threat of ground invasion. During Phase 2 of the ‘evacuation orders’, on 8 December 2023, residents of Jabaliya, Shujaiyeh, Zaytoun, and the Old City of Gaza were instructed to evacuate towards the south-western part of Gaza City. On 29 January 2024, those same areas of south-western Gaza City received an ‘evacuation order’ instructing already displaced civilians to relocate once again towards Deir Al-Balah (see Figure 12).

 - Figure 12. A map showing evacuation orders from December 2023 and January 2024, which operate together to displace evacuees multiple times.  (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
Figure 12. A map showing evacuation orders from December 2023 and January 2024, which operate together to displace evacuees multiple times. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)

‘Evacuation orders’ to areas subsequently attacked by the Israeli military

On the morning of 20 February 2024 at 09:29 am local time, the Israeli military published an ‘evacuation order’ for the neighbourhoods of al-Zaitoun and al-Turkman (see Figure 13). The order instructed Palestinians in these neighbourhoods to evacuate to the ‘Mawasi Humanitarian Zone’ via Salah al-Din Street. Approximately eleven hours later, online reports emerged about attacks in al-Mawasi overnight and further advancement of the Israeli ground operation in the area. As reported by al-Jazeera on 21 February, despite being designated as a ‘safe zone’ by the military, al-Mawasi came under heavy bombardment, with bulldozers on the ground and aerial strikes by attack drones causing a number of civilian fatalities and injuries. Doctors Without Borders (MSF) has reported that during the attack on 20 February 2024, an Israeli tank fired on a house sheltering MSF members and killed two members of their families. The Israeli military issued the same order on 21 February to the residents of al-Zaitoun and al-Turkman, instructing them to go to al-Mawasi even though the ‘safe zone’ there had been attacked, and Israeli tanks were still in the area.

 - Figure 13. An ‘evacuation order’ published on 20 February 2024 instructed a region (in yellow) to evacuate and follow Salah al-Din Street to reach the ‘safe zone’ in al-Mawasi (in blue). Subsequently, the ‘safe zone’ in al-Mawasi was attacked, including a shelter operated by Doctors Without Borders (labelled). (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
Figure 13. An ‘evacuation order’ published on 20 February 2024 instructed a region (in yellow) to evacuate and follow Salah al-Din Street to reach the ‘safe zone’ in al-Mawasi (in blue). Subsequently, the ‘safe zone’ in al-Mawasi was attacked, including a shelter operated by Doctors Without Borders (labelled). (Forensic Architecture, 2024)

‘Evacuation orders’ to destroyed areas

Until the temporary ceasefire on 24 November 2023, as people were being instructed by the Israeli military to travel ‘south’, and while those who had been displaced in the south were being prevented by the army from returning north to reach their homes during the ceasefire, the same southern areas to which civilians were already displaced, and were repeatedly instructed to relocate to, continued to be targeted (Figure 14). Our analysis shows that during this period, by 7 January 2024, many of the areas to which people were being instructed to relocate using the Israeli military’s ‘evacuation grid’ were destroyed or severely damaged. For instance, on 8 December, when an Israeli military ‘evacuation order’ (Figure 12) instructed residents of Jabaliya, Shujaiyeh, Zaytoun, and the Old City of Gaza to evacuate towards the western part of Gaza City, this area was already largely destroyed (see Figure 15).

 - Figure 14. A map showing the total area subject to evacuation orders through 26 November 2023 (in yellow), compared to destroyed and damaged buildings according to UNOSAT (black). The total area ordered to evacuate by this date was still 149km2 (41% of the total area of the Gaza Strip). (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
Figure 14. A map showing the total area subject to evacuation orders through 26 November 2023 (in yellow), compared to destroyed and damaged buildings according to UNOSAT (black). The total area ordered to evacuate by this date was still 149km2 (41% of the total area of the Gaza Strip). (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
 - Figure 15. A map showing the arrow from an ‘evacuation order’ posted on 8 December, which instructs evacuees to move to an area with destroyed and damaged structures, according to UNOSAT destruction analysis (black). (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
Figure 15. A map showing the arrow from an ‘evacuation order’ posted on 8 December, which instructs evacuees to move to an area with destroyed and damaged structures, according to UNOSAT destruction analysis (black). (Forensic Architecture, 2024)

The Fallacy of ‘Safe Zones’ and ‘Safe Routes’

Boundaries of ‘safe zones’: Elastic, unclear and inconsistent

The boundaries of various ‘safe zones’ have not been clearly defined or effectively communicated, neither to Palestinian civilians seeking safety in Gaza nor to the general public, including human rights investigators monitoring attacks on these ‘safe zones’ (see Figure 16).

An illustrative instance of the ambiguous and elastic boundaries delineating ‘safe zones’ is evident in the case of the Mawasi area west of Khan Younis.

 - Figure 16. The Israeli military has released at least four distinct versions of the boundaries of the al-Mawasi ‘safe zone’, on 18 and 22 October, and 2 and 6 December 2023. Overlaying these different boundaries on a single map, we demonstrate the inconsistent and changing boundaries of the ‘safe zone’ in al-Mawasi. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
Figure 16. The Israeli military has released at least four distinct versions of the boundaries of the al-Mawasi ‘safe zone’, on 18 and 22 October, and 2 and 6 December 2023. Overlaying these different boundaries on a single map, we demonstrate the inconsistent and changing boundaries of the ‘safe zone’ in al-Mawasi. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)

The size and borders of this zone, as conveyed by the Israeli military, have fluctuated multiple times. Notably, its boundaries are rendered as significantly more expansive in publications where the Israeli military makes claims regarding the alleged use of these ‘safe zones’ as part of Palestinian armed resistance (Figure 17). In contrast, when Palestinians are instructed to take refuge in the ‘safe zone’ of al-Mawasi, its boundaries encompass a visibly smaller area. In other words, the boundary operates flexibly to support Israeli narratives about its humanitarian and military measures, rather than to establish consistent boundaries for ensuring safe refuge.

 - Figure 17. The blue boundary (our annotation) indicates the boundary of the ‘al-Mawasi Humanitarian Zone’ published by the Israeli military on 22 October. According to that boundary, the launch site is situated outside the ‘Humanitarian Zone’. In contrast, the larger white boundary for the ‘Humanitarian Zone’ was published by the Israeli military on 6 December, to support its claims that the area is utilised by Palestinian fighters for launching rockets. (Image source: original communication by the Israeli military, 6 Dec 2023)
Figure 17. The blue boundary (our annotation) indicates the boundary of the ‘al-Mawasi Humanitarian Zone’ published by the Israeli military on 22 October. According to that boundary, the launch site is situated outside the ‘Humanitarian Zone’. In contrast, the larger white boundary for the ‘Humanitarian Zone’ was published by the Israeli military on 6 December, to support its claims that the area is utilised by Palestinian fighters for launching rockets. (Image source: original communication by the Israeli military, 6 Dec 2023)

Moreover, multiple ‘evacuation orders’ instructed civilians to relocate to Rafah without providing explicit boundaries for ‘safe areas’ within the city. Some orders explicitly refer to neighbourhoods in Rafah—’al-Shaboura’, ‘al-Sultan’, and ‘al-Zohour’—as ‘known shelters’, as if to suggest that their status and bounds as ‘shelters’ were already known, waiving the need for clarification.

Multiple ‘evacuation orders’ also instructed civilians to relocate to Deir al-Balah. None of these orders provided explicit boundaries for specific ‘safe zones’ within the city—except for one we identified that uses the numbered block system of the aforementioned ‘evacuation grid’ to mark certain blocks within Deir al-Balah as ‘safe’.

Direct attacks on designated ‘safe zones’ and ‘safe routes’

On 13 October 2023—the same day it had been declared a ‘safe route’ for displaced civilians moving south—Salah al-Din Street was the target of an Israeli airstrike that hit a civilian convoy and reportedly killed seventy. Ground and aerial attacks on this evacuation route and widespread destruction around it, including in areas south of Wadi Gaza, evidence the danger of Israel’s own designated ‘safe routes’.

 - Figure 18. On the same day of the evacuation order instructing the civilian population north Wadi Gaza to evacuate, the Israeli-sanctioned ‘safe route’ along Salah al-Din Street designated to facilitate evacuation was bombed by the Israeli military. A civilian convoy was hit, and seventy civilians were reportedly killed. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
Figure 18. On the same day of the evacuation order instructing the civilian population north Wadi Gaza to evacuate, the Israeli-sanctioned ‘safe route’ along Salah al-Din Street designated to facilitate evacuation was bombed by the Israeli military. A civilian convoy was hit, and seventy civilians were reportedly killed. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)

Our analysis confirms numerous instances of Israeli military attacks on ‘safe zones’ in al-Mawasi, Deir al-Balah and Rafah. At least two such attacks have occurred since Phase 2 of the ‘evacuation orders’, which began on 1 December.

Forensic Architecture has verified a case in which the Israeli military shot at a Palestinian civilian holding a white flag, close to al-Aqsa university inside the ‘Mawasi Humanitarian Zone’ on 23 January 2024 (see Figure 19). This case was further analysed by the investigative agency Earshot, who verified the location of the Israeli tanks from which this civilian was targeted.

 - Figure 19. The location of Israeli tanks on 22 January 2024, and the location of a civilian shot at while holding a white flag on 23 January 2024, with respect to al-Aqsa University within the al-Mawasi Humanitarian Zone. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
Figure 19. The location of Israeli tanks on 22 January 2024, and the location of a civilian shot at while holding a white flag on 23 January 2024, with respect to al-Aqsa University within the al-Mawasi Humanitarian Zone. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)

Moreover, a comparison of satellite imagery of the al-Mawasi ‘humanitarian zone’ from 19 October 2023 and from 29 January 2024 reveals numerous craters in this ‘safe zone, indicative of military activity (see Figure 20). These signs of destruction appeared during a period in which the Israeli military had made multiple announcements referring to al-Mawasi as a ‘humanitarian zone’ and a safe refuge for Palestinians.

We continued to identify new craters within this declared ‘safe zone’ through 4 February 2024 (see Figure 21).

 - Figure 20. Craters in the al-Mawasi ‘humanitarian zone’. Damage identified by UNOSAT is visible in satellite imagery (© Planet Labs PBC) on 19 October 2023. By 29 January 2024, after multiple announcements about the al-Mawasi ‘humanitarian zone’, new craters are visible within it. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
Figure 20. Craters in the al-Mawasi ‘humanitarian zone’. Damage identified by UNOSAT is visible in satellite imagery (© Planet Labs PBC) on 19 October 2023. By 29 January 2024, after multiple announcements about the al-Mawasi ‘humanitarian zone’, new craters are visible within it. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
 - Figure 21. Satellite imagery (© Planet Labs PBC) shows new craters in the southern region of the al-Mawasi ‘humanitarian zone’ between 30 November 2023 and 4 February 2024. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
Figure 21. Satellite imagery (© Planet Labs PBC) shows new craters in the southern region of the al-Mawasi ‘humanitarian zone’ between 30 November 2023 and 4 February 2024. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)

Destruction analysis published by UNOSAT indicates that the ‘safe zones’ in Rafah and Deir al-Balah were also attacked and damaged, as of 7 January 2024 (see Figure 22-23).

 - Figure 22. Damage to structures (black) in the Deir al-Balah municipality (light and dark blue) as of 7 January 2024 based on data published by UNOSAT. The darker blue region indicates numbered blocks that the Israeli military explicitly announced as ‘safe’ in a flyer distributed on 8 January 2024. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
Figure 22. Damage to structures (black) in the Deir al-Balah municipality (light and dark blue) as of 7 January 2024 based on data published by UNOSAT. The darker blue region indicates numbered blocks that the Israeli military explicitly announced as ‘safe’ in a flyer distributed on 8 January 2024. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
 - Figure 23. Damage to structures (black) in the Rafah municipality (light blue) as of 7 January 2024 based on data published by UNOSAT. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
Figure 23. Damage to structures (black) in the Rafah municipality (light blue) as of 7 January 2024 based on data published by UNOSAT. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)

Attacks on Hospitals and Schools serving as ‘shelters’

Attacks on Hospitals

In addition to their function as critical forms of medical infrastructure, hospitals in Gaza have also been key sites of refuge for displaced persons during the ground invasion. The destruction of this infrastructure has created life-threatening conditions that have effectively brought about forced population transfer, leading to the displacement of thousands of individuals seeking shelter. Gaza’s largest hospital, al-Shifa, was reported to have sheltered at least 50,000 displaced persons before it was invaded and depopulated on 15 November 2023. Similarly, the invasion of al-Quds Hospital between 13 and 14 November 2023 caused the additional displacement of 12,000 people who had been sheltering there.

The destruction of medical infrastructure in Gaza has unfolded in tandem with the expansion and spatial distribution of the ‘evacuation orders’ and Israeli ground invasion, progressing from ‘north’ to ‘south’ and mimicking the same pattern of attacks on hospitals that Forensic Architecture has previously documented.

 - Figure 24. During Phase 1 of mass displacement (between 13 October and 24 November 2023) at least 16 out of 20 hospitals in northern Gaza went out of service. Three of the remaining hospitals were forced out of service after the end of the temporary ceasefire in December 2023. The one hospital in ‘northern’ Gaza that remained functional after December 2024 was a smaller maternity facility. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
Figure 24. During Phase 1 of mass displacement (between 13 October and 24 November 2023) at least 16 out of 20 hospitals in northern Gaza went out of service. Three of the remaining hospitals were forced out of service after the end of the temporary ceasefire in December 2023. The one hospital in ‘northern’ Gaza that remained functional after December 2024 was a smaller maternity facility. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
 - Figure 25. During Phase 2 of mass displacement (1 December 2023 – ongoing), more hospitals were forced out of service, including Nasser Hospital, the largest in ‘south’ Gaza. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
Figure 25. During Phase 2 of mass displacement (1 December 2023 – ongoing), more hospitals were forced out of service, including Nasser Hospital, the largest in ‘south’ Gaza. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)

At least twenty-four hospitals have reportedly been forced out of service across the Gaza Strip. These hospitals are primarily located within areas that have received ‘evacuation orders’ (see Figure 25).

54 Evac After Shifa - Figure 26. An ‘evacuation order’ was published on 29 January 2024 (darker yellow region) for the area where al-Shifa is located, weeks after the hospital was already invaded and went out-of-service in November 2023, and after it started regaining parts of its functionality following the temporary ceasefire. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
Figure 26. An ‘evacuation order’ was published on 29 January 2024 (darker yellow region) for the area where al-Shifa is located, weeks after the hospital was already invaded and went out-of-service in November 2023, and after it started regaining parts of its functionality following the temporary ceasefire. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)

All hospitals located in areas reached by the advancing ground invasion were reportedly forced out of service (see Figure 27), including al-Khair Hospital in al-Mawasi, which was not subject to any ‘evacuation orders’. On 22 January, the Israeli army stormed al-Khair Hospital, the only hospital located in the ‘safe zone’ in al-Mawasi, and arrested members of staff, according to the Gaza health ministry (see Figure 28).

 - Figure 27. Correlation between the expansion of the Israeli ground invasion and the locations of hospitals forced out of service. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
Figure 27. Correlation between the expansion of the Israeli ground invasion and the locations of hospitals forced out of service. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
 - Figure 28. The ground invasion in Khan Younis has pushed Nasser and al-Amal hospitals out of service, in addition to al-Khair, the only hospital inside the ‘safe zone’ in the area. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
Figure 28. The ground invasion in Khan Younis has pushed Nasser and al-Amal hospitals out of service, in addition to al-Khair, the only hospital inside the ‘safe zone’ in the area. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)

Attacks on Schools

According to data published by the UN on 2 March 2024, 318 schools have served as shelters since October. Based on satellite imagery analysis and initial field reports, at least 287 of these schools have been damaged or destroyed, and 39 of them were located within the supposed ‘safe zone’ of the Rafah municipality. The attacks on and destruction of these facilities has led to further displacement of the civilian population taking refuge in them (see Figure 29).

57-School-shelter-damage - Figure 29. Data published by the UN shows locations of damaged and destroyed schools in Gaza Strip. Schools documented to have received internally displaced people (IDPs) are marked by larger icons (red and yellow). Schools that received IDPs and were also damaged are marked red. The map only shows schools that have been damaged.(Forensic Architecture, 2024)
Figure 29. Data published by the UN shows locations of damaged and destroyed schools in Gaza Strip. Schools documented to have received internally displaced people (IDPs) are marked by larger icons (red and yellow). Schools that received IDPs and were also damaged are marked red. The map only shows schools that have been damaged.(Forensic Architecture, 2024)

Attacks on educational facilities acting as shelters also include training centres like the UNRWA Khan Younis Training Centre (KYTC), located directly adjacent to the ‘humanitarian area’ in al-Mawasi. The facility became an overcrowded shelter for 43,000 displaced persons. Satellite images taken by Planet on 30 November 2023 show tents dispersed throughout the UNRWA facility. On 24 January, the UN reported that thirteen people were killed and many more injured when a building within the facility was hit by direct fire. Two days later, on 26 January, the Israeli army ordered the displaced civilians taking refuge in the UN-run shelter to leave by the afternoon of the same day. Satellite imagery from 4 February shows the evacuation of the tent camp, which was then cleared and destroyed (see Figure 30).

 - Figure 30. Satellite images (© Planet Labs PBC) showing the UNRWA Khan Younis Training Centre (KYTC), used as a shelter for displaced people throughout December 2023 and January 2024, and subsequently cleared and destroyed by 4 February 2024. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)
Figure 30. Satellite images (© Planet Labs PBC) showing the UNRWA Khan Younis Training Centre (KYTC), used as a shelter for displaced people throughout December 2023 and January 2024, and subsequently cleared and destroyed by 4 February 2024. (Forensic Architecture, 2024)

At the International Court of Justice (ICJ), Israel has cited its use of ‘humanitarian measures’ to defend itself against the charge of genocide. Our research reveals these measures, far from protecting Palestinian civilians, serve rather to support Israel’s genocidal campaign by systematically forcing civilians into unliveable areas, where they inevitably come under renewed attack, only to be displaced yet again. Israel’s abuse of ‘humanitarian measures’ has not only continued but escalated since the ICJ’s 26 January ruling on provisional measures, as the 1.5 million civilians now sheltering in Rafah find themselves at risk of imminent attack with nowhere left to flee to.

Team

Forensic Architecture Team

Extended Team

Extended Team
Support
Dr. Nicola Perugini (University of Edinburgh)

Collaborators

Exhibitions

Exhibitions

Events

Events

Press

Press

Investigations